TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting functional movement capacity in adults
T2 - the effect of range of motion and isometric strength
AU - Özkan, Mazhar
AU - Canli, Umut
AU - Alwhaibi, Reem
AU - Ustaömer, Kübra
AU - Karaçam, Aydın
AU - Orhan, Bekir Erhan
AU - Bohn, Lucimere
AU - Sivrikaya, Kenan
AU - Sönmeyenmakas, Aytekin
AU - Gonzalez, Pablo Prieto
N1 - © 2024. The Author(s).
PY - 2024/7/2
Y1 - 2024/7/2
N2 - The aim of the study was to determine the role of isometric strength and range of motion in predicting Functional Movement Screen (FMS) scores of adults. A total of 120 participants (age = 34.62 ± 11.82 years; height = 170.56 ± 9.63 cm; weight = 73.62 ± 15.39 kg) volunteered to participate in the study. Anthropometric measurements were performed, including height, body weight, muscle mass, and body fat. Following this, the ranges of motion of the shoulder, hip, knee, and ankle joints were measured sequentially. Isometric strength and FMS tests were then performed. Hip extension isometric strength explained 23% of the variation in FMS
total. The common effect of knee flexion, shoulder flexion, and dorsiflexion joint range of motion explained 34% of the change in FMS
total (F
(3-116) = 20.375, p < 0.001). A significant relationship (R = 0.658, R
2 = 0.413) was found between hip extension isometric strength, knee flexion, shoulder flexion, and dorsiflexion range of motion and FMS
total (F
(4-115) = 21.952, p < 0.001). The common effect of all these variables explains 43% of the change in FMS
total. The results indicate that the FMS test scores, which are utilized to evaluate the risk of injury in sedentary adults, can be significantly predicted by the effect of hip extension isometric strength and parameters related to knee flexion, shoulder flexion, and dorsiflexion joint range of motion. At this time, it is advised that range of motion and isometric strength be taken into account when determining a person's functional movement capacity.
AB - The aim of the study was to determine the role of isometric strength and range of motion in predicting Functional Movement Screen (FMS) scores of adults. A total of 120 participants (age = 34.62 ± 11.82 years; height = 170.56 ± 9.63 cm; weight = 73.62 ± 15.39 kg) volunteered to participate in the study. Anthropometric measurements were performed, including height, body weight, muscle mass, and body fat. Following this, the ranges of motion of the shoulder, hip, knee, and ankle joints were measured sequentially. Isometric strength and FMS tests were then performed. Hip extension isometric strength explained 23% of the variation in FMS
total. The common effect of knee flexion, shoulder flexion, and dorsiflexion joint range of motion explained 34% of the change in FMS
total (F
(3-116) = 20.375, p < 0.001). A significant relationship (R = 0.658, R
2 = 0.413) was found between hip extension isometric strength, knee flexion, shoulder flexion, and dorsiflexion range of motion and FMS
total (F
(4-115) = 21.952, p < 0.001). The common effect of all these variables explains 43% of the change in FMS
total. The results indicate that the FMS test scores, which are utilized to evaluate the risk of injury in sedentary adults, can be significantly predicted by the effect of hip extension isometric strength and parameters related to knee flexion, shoulder flexion, and dorsiflexion joint range of motion. At this time, it is advised that range of motion and isometric strength be taken into account when determining a person's functional movement capacity.
KW - Flexibility
KW - Functional capacity
KW - Injury risk
KW - Mobility
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85197264879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13102-024-00935-0
DO - 10.1186/s13102-024-00935-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 38956714
AN - SCOPUS:85197264879
SN - 2052-1847
VL - 16
SP - 145
JO - BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 1
M1 - 145
ER -