TY - JOUR
T1 - Elites, single parties and political decision making in Southern European dictatorships
T2 - The Salazar, Franco and Mussolini regimes
AU - Costa Pinto, António
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Intellect Ltd 2004.
PY - 2004/9/1
Y1 - 2004/9/1
N2 - Awareness of the interaction between the single party, the government, the State apparatus and civil society appears fundamental if we are to achieve an understanding of the different ways in which the various dictatorships of the fascist era functioned. The party and its ancillary organisations were not simply parallel institutions: they attempted to gain control of the bureaucracy and select the governing elite – forcing some dictatorships towards an unstable equilibrium in the process, even while they were the central agents for the creation and maintenance of the leader’s charismatic authority. These articles focus on an analysis of the gradations of these tensions, that may be illustrated by the eventual emergence of a weaker or stronger ‘dualism of power’ that appears to be the determining factor in explanations for the typological and classificatory variations used to qualify those dictatorships that have been historically associated with fascism and which have been variously defined as ‘authoritarian’ and ‘totalitarian’, or as ‘authoritarian’ and ‘fascist’. It is in this perspective that we will study three dictatorships that have each been associated with European fascism: Portuguese Salazarism, Spanish Francoism and Italian Fascism.
AB - Awareness of the interaction between the single party, the government, the State apparatus and civil society appears fundamental if we are to achieve an understanding of the different ways in which the various dictatorships of the fascist era functioned. The party and its ancillary organisations were not simply parallel institutions: they attempted to gain control of the bureaucracy and select the governing elite – forcing some dictatorships towards an unstable equilibrium in the process, even while they were the central agents for the creation and maintenance of the leader’s charismatic authority. These articles focus on an analysis of the gradations of these tensions, that may be illustrated by the eventual emergence of a weaker or stronger ‘dualism of power’ that appears to be the determining factor in explanations for the typological and classificatory variations used to qualify those dictatorships that have been historically associated with fascism and which have been variously defined as ‘authoritarian’ and ‘totalitarian’, or as ‘authoritarian’ and ‘fascist’. It is in this perspective that we will study three dictatorships that have each been associated with European fascism: Portuguese Salazarism, Spanish Francoism and Italian Fascism.
KW - Authoritarian
KW - Dualism of power
KW - Fascist era
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84908327234
U2 - 10.1386/pjss.3.2.71/0
DO - 10.1386/pjss.3.2.71/0
M3 - Editorial
AN - SCOPUS:84908327234
SN - 1476-413X
VL - 3
SP - 71
JO - Portuguese Journal of Social Science
JF - Portuguese Journal of Social Science
IS - 2
ER -