TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of acupuncture on cancer pain
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Faria, Miguel
AU - Teixeira, Mónica
AU - Pinto, Maria João
AU - Sargento, Paulo
N1 - Copyright © 2024 Shanghai Yueyang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/5/1
Y1 - 2024/5/1
N2 - Background: Pain associated with cancer is one of the greatest causes of reduced quality of life in patients. Acupuncture is one of the treatments used to address this issue, with the great advantage of having little or no side effects, especially when compared with pharmacological pain-killers. Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the current evidence regarding the efficacy of acupuncture for cancer pain. Search strategy: Six electronic databases (PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Scielo, b-On and Scopus) were searched for relevant articles about pain relief in cancer patients from their beginning until 2022 using MeSH terms such as “acupuncture,” “electroacupuncture,” “ear acupuncture,” “acupuncture analgesia,” ‘‘oncological pain,” and “cancer pain.” Inclusion criteria: Studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) where acupuncture was compared with no treatment, placebo acupuncture or usual care. Data extraction and analysis: Three independent reviewers participated in data extraction and evaluation of risk of bias, and a meta-analysis was conducted. The primary outcome was pain intensity, measured with the visual analog scale, numeric rating scale, or brief pain inventory. Secondary outcomes also assessed were quality of life, functionality, xerostomia, pain interference, and analgesic consumption. Results were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Sixteen RCTs with a total of 1124 participants were included in the meta-analysis, with the majority of the studies presenting a low or unclear risk of bias. Acupuncture was more effective in reducing pain than no treatment (SMD = –0.90, 95 % CI [–1.68, –0.12]), sham acupuncture (SMD = –1.10, 95 % CI [–1.59, –0.61]) or usual care (SMD = –1.16, 95 % CI [–1.38, –0.93]). Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that acupuncture may be an effective intervention to reduce pain associated with cancer. Despite some limitations due to the low quality and small sample size of some included studies, as well as the different types and stages of cancer, acupuncture might provide an effective and safe treatment to reduce cancer pain. Please cite this article as: Faria M, Teixeira M, Pinto MJ, Sargento P. Efficacy of acupuncture on cancer pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Integr Med. 2024; 22(3): 235–244.
AB - Background: Pain associated with cancer is one of the greatest causes of reduced quality of life in patients. Acupuncture is one of the treatments used to address this issue, with the great advantage of having little or no side effects, especially when compared with pharmacological pain-killers. Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the current evidence regarding the efficacy of acupuncture for cancer pain. Search strategy: Six electronic databases (PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Scielo, b-On and Scopus) were searched for relevant articles about pain relief in cancer patients from their beginning until 2022 using MeSH terms such as “acupuncture,” “electroacupuncture,” “ear acupuncture,” “acupuncture analgesia,” ‘‘oncological pain,” and “cancer pain.” Inclusion criteria: Studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) where acupuncture was compared with no treatment, placebo acupuncture or usual care. Data extraction and analysis: Three independent reviewers participated in data extraction and evaluation of risk of bias, and a meta-analysis was conducted. The primary outcome was pain intensity, measured with the visual analog scale, numeric rating scale, or brief pain inventory. Secondary outcomes also assessed were quality of life, functionality, xerostomia, pain interference, and analgesic consumption. Results were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Sixteen RCTs with a total of 1124 participants were included in the meta-analysis, with the majority of the studies presenting a low or unclear risk of bias. Acupuncture was more effective in reducing pain than no treatment (SMD = –0.90, 95 % CI [–1.68, –0.12]), sham acupuncture (SMD = –1.10, 95 % CI [–1.59, –0.61]) or usual care (SMD = –1.16, 95 % CI [–1.38, –0.93]). Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that acupuncture may be an effective intervention to reduce pain associated with cancer. Despite some limitations due to the low quality and small sample size of some included studies, as well as the different types and stages of cancer, acupuncture might provide an effective and safe treatment to reduce cancer pain. Please cite this article as: Faria M, Teixeira M, Pinto MJ, Sargento P. Efficacy of acupuncture on cancer pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Integr Med. 2024; 22(3): 235–244.
KW - Acupuncture Therapy
KW - Cancer Pain/therapy
KW - Humans
KW - Neoplasms/complications
KW - Pain Management/methods
KW - Pain Measurement
KW - Quality of Life
KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
KW - Treatment Outcome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85187985729&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.joim.2024.03.002
DO - 10.1016/j.joim.2024.03.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 38493063
AN - SCOPUS:85187985729
SN - 2095-4964
VL - 22
SP - 235
EP - 244
JO - Journal of Integrative Medicine
JF - Journal of Integrative Medicine
IS - 3
ER -