@article{195d167484674d799d6e4a1a8aab5e9b,
title = "Comparing self-reported energy intake using an online dietary tool with energy expenditure by an activity tracker",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of this study was to compare self-reported total energy intake (TEI) collected using an online multiple-pass 24-h dietary recall tool (Intake24) with total energy expenditure (TEE) estimated from Fitbit Charge 2-improved algorithms in adults from the NoHoW trial (12-mo weight maintenance after free-living weight loss). Methods: Bland–Altman plots were used to assess the level of agreement between TEI and TEE at baseline and after 12 mo. The ratio of TEI to TEE was also calculated. Results: Data from 1323 participants (71\% female) was included in the analysis (mean ± SD: age 45 ± 12 y, body mass index 29.7 ± 5.4 kg/m2, initial weight loss 11.5 ± 6.5 kg). The TEI was lower than TEE on average by 33\%, with limits of agreement ranging from –91\% to +25\%. Men, younger individuals, those with higher body mass index, those with the greater weight loss before enrollment, and those who gained weight during the study underestimated to a greater extent. Conclusions: These findings contribute to the ongoing research examining the validity of technology-based dietary assessment tools.",
keywords = "Adult, Energy Intake, Energy Metabolism, Female, Fitness Trackers, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Self Report, Weight Loss",
author = "Aikaterina Vasileiou and Dominique Searle and Larsen, \{Sofus C.\} and Faidon Magkos and Graham Horgan and Stubbs, \{R. James\} and In{\^e}s Santos and Palmeira, \{Ant{\'o}nio L.\} and Heitmann, \{Berit L.\}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2024",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.nut.2023.112258",
language = "English",
volume = "118",
pages = "112258",
journal = "Nutrition",
issn = "0899-9007",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
}