A comparison study between official records and self-reports of childhood adversity

Ricardo J. Pinto, Ângela C. Maia

Resultado de pesquisarevisão de pares

27 Citações (Scopus)

Resumo

The aim of this paper was to assess the degree and nature of any mismatch between officially recognised child maltreatment and adolescent self-report of adverse child experiences. Participants included 136 adolescents (72 males, 64 females, Mage=17years, age range 14-23years) who had been confirmed as victims of maltreatment prior to age 13 by Child Protective Services. Participants' self-reports were obtained in adolescence, at least four years after identification. Physical neglect was the most prevalent experience found in the records (87%, n=118). When this experience was assessed through self-report, only 36 per cent (n=49) of participants reported physical neglect. Sexual abuse was self-reported by 17 per cent (n=23) of the sample, compared with eight per cent (n=11) in the records. Only 17 per cent (n=23), a small number of self-reports, were consistent with official records. Kappa values show that agreement is low (under 0.40) for seven of the ten categories. Our findings suggest substantial unreliability in the reporting of child abuse and neglect, including household adverse experiences. They also suggest the failure of professionals to discover several adverse experiences during childhood, even after identification by authorities.

Idioma originalInglês
Páginas (de-até)354-366
Número de páginas13
RevistaChild Abuse Review
Volume22
Número de emissão5
DOIs
Estado da publicaçãoPublicadas - set. 2013
Publicado externamenteSim

Impressão digital

Mergulhe nos tópicos de investigação de “A comparison study between official records and self-reports of childhood adversity“. Em conjunto formam uma impressão digital única.

Citar isto