Wearable devices for physical activity and healthcare monitoring in elderly people: A critical review

Eduardo Teixeira, Hélder Fonseca, Florêncio Diniz-Sousa, Lucas Veras, Giorjines Boppre, José Oliveira, Diogo Pinto, Alberto Jorge Alves, Ana Barbosa, Romeu Mendes, Inês Marques-Aleixo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The availability of wearable devices (WDs) to collect biometric information and their use during activities of daily living is significantly increasing in the general population. These small electronic devices, which record fitness and health-related outcomes, have been broadly utilized in industries such as medicine, healthcare, and fitness. Since they are simple to use and progressively cheaper, they have also been used for numerous research purposes. However, despite their increasing popularity, most of these WDs do not accurately measure the proclaimed outcomes. In fact, research is equivocal about whether they are valid and reliable methods to specifically evaluate physical activity and health-related outcomes in older adults, since they are mostly designed and produced considering younger subjects’ physical and mental characteristics. Additionally, their constant evolution through continuous upgrades and redesigned versions, suggests the need for constant up-to-date reviews and research. Accordingly, this article aims to scrutinize the state-of-the-art scientific evidence about the usefulness of WDs, specifically on older adults, to monitor physical activity and health-related outcomes. This critical review not only aims to inform older consumers but also aid researchers in study design when selecting physical activity and healthcare monitoring devices for elderly people.

Original languageEnglish
Article number38
JournalGeriatrics (Switzerland)
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Apr 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

Funding: CIAFEL is funded by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), Portugal (Ref: FCT UID/DTP/00617/2020). CIDESD is funded by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), Portugal (Ref: UID04045/2020). EPIUnit—Instituto de Saúde Pública—is funded by the FCT, Portugal (Ref: UID/DTP/04750/2013). F.S., G.B. and L.V. are supported by FCT grants SFRH/BD/117622/2016, SFRH/BD/146976/2019 and UI/BD/150673/2020, respectively. A.B. is supported by FCT grant SFRH/BD/136702/2018. The work of A.J.A. and D.P. is funded by FEDER funds, through the Operational Competitiveness Factors Program 2020 (COMPETE2020) (Ref: POCI-01-0145-FEDER-030646) and by national funds through the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), Portugal (Ref: PTDC/SAUDES/30646/2017).

FundersFunder number
COMPETE2020POCI-01-0145-FEDER-030646, PTDC/SAUDES/30646/2017
Fundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaUID04045/2020, UID/DTP/04750/2013, UI/BD/150673/2020, SFRH/BD/146976/2019, SFRH/BD/136702/2018, SFRH/BD/117622/2016, UID/DTP/00617/2020

    Keywords

    • Bone
    • Cardiovascular
    • Cognitive function
    • Diabetes
    • Exercise
    • Sensors
    • Sleep
    • Steeps
    • Technology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Wearable devices for physical activity and healthcare monitoring in elderly people: A critical review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this