TY - JOUR
T1 - The relationship of body mass index, age and triceps-surae musculotendinous stiffness with the foot arch structure of postmenopausal women
AU - Faria, Aurélio
AU - Gabriel, Ronaldo
AU - Abrantes, João
AU - Brás, Rui
AU - Moreira, Helena
PY - 2010/7
Y1 - 2010/7
N2 - Background: Low- or high-arched feet and insufficient or excessive muscle-tendon stiffness have been identified as risk factors for lower extremity injuries. Additionally, increased body mass index and age may be responsible for structural changes of the foot, which might adversely affect the functional capacity of the longitudinal arch. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of body mass, age and triceps-surae musculotendinous stiffness with the foot arch structure of postmenopausal women. Methods: 81 post menopausal women (58.0 (SD 6.0) years) participated. An in vivo free oscillation technique was used to assess musculotendinous stiffness of the ankle. The two-step protocol was used to acquire gait plantar pressure data. Dynamic arch index was calculated as the ratio of the midfoot area to the area of the entire foot excluding the toes. Three groups were formed (cavus, normal and planus). Findings: Significant differences (P < 0.05) between the groups cavus and planus were found for age using the ANOVA test. Using Kruskal-Wallis tests significant differences were found for body mass index between the cavus-normal groups and cavus-planus (P < 0.001) but no significant differences were found for triceps-surae musculotendinous stiffness between foot-type groups. Interpretation: Since obese subjects present greater downward vertical forces, they might be more prone to overload foot structures leading to the collapse of the medial longitudinal arch affecting adversely the functional capacity of the foot. Deterioration of the musculoskeletal system, due to age, may also affect foot arch structure. No relationship between musculotendinous stiffness and foot arch structure appears to exist.
AB - Background: Low- or high-arched feet and insufficient or excessive muscle-tendon stiffness have been identified as risk factors for lower extremity injuries. Additionally, increased body mass index and age may be responsible for structural changes of the foot, which might adversely affect the functional capacity of the longitudinal arch. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of body mass, age and triceps-surae musculotendinous stiffness with the foot arch structure of postmenopausal women. Methods: 81 post menopausal women (58.0 (SD 6.0) years) participated. An in vivo free oscillation technique was used to assess musculotendinous stiffness of the ankle. The two-step protocol was used to acquire gait plantar pressure data. Dynamic arch index was calculated as the ratio of the midfoot area to the area of the entire foot excluding the toes. Three groups were formed (cavus, normal and planus). Findings: Significant differences (P < 0.05) between the groups cavus and planus were found for age using the ANOVA test. Using Kruskal-Wallis tests significant differences were found for body mass index between the cavus-normal groups and cavus-planus (P < 0.001) but no significant differences were found for triceps-surae musculotendinous stiffness between foot-type groups. Interpretation: Since obese subjects present greater downward vertical forces, they might be more prone to overload foot structures leading to the collapse of the medial longitudinal arch affecting adversely the functional capacity of the foot. Deterioration of the musculoskeletal system, due to age, may also affect foot arch structure. No relationship between musculotendinous stiffness and foot arch structure appears to exist.
KW - Ankle
KW - Foot structure
KW - Medial longitudinal arch
KW - Menopause
KW - Musculotendinous stiffness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952551177&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.02.014
DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.02.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 20398984
AN - SCOPUS:77952551177
SN - 0268-0033
VL - 25
SP - 588
EP - 593
JO - Clinical Biomechanics
JF - Clinical Biomechanics
IS - 6
ER -