Populist Leaders: The New Prince

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Centuries ago, Machiavelli wrote his most book, The Prince, and offered it to Lourenço de Medici, hoping that it would be useful to persuade him to accept the challenge of unifying Italy and becoming a new prince. In the second decade of the twentieth century, Gramsci, arrested in the fascist prison, refused the image of a man as new prince, and presented the party-prince as the inventor of a new political and social model. In Portugal, after the end of the dictatorship, Adriano Moreira conceived the Army Force Movement as the very new prince because some members of the military forces, after having overthrown the regime, intended to control the new political conjuncture. Nowadays, all over the world, populist leaders are presenting themselves as the new prince. The only who can embody the pure people and guide it in the fight against the corrupt elite. The chapter analyzes this scenario, identifying the several types of populism and the populist strategies, both while in opposition and after reaching power. Moreover, it points to some financing scandals involving populist parties or leaders and proves that the charisma of the very new prince is rather a problem than a solution for representative democracy.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGlobalization, Human Rights and Populism
Subtitle of host publicationReimagining People, Power and Places
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages43-61
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9783031172038
ISBN (Print)9783031172021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023.

Keywords

  • Charisma
  • Illiberal democracy
  • New prince
  • Populism
  • Representative democracy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Populist Leaders: The New Prince'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this