Abstract
Exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a major contributor to skin injury, including sunburn, photoaging, and augmented risk of skin cancer, primarily through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that induce oxidative stress. Rosmarinic acid (RA), a natural phenolic compound with antioxidant and several other biological properties, has shown promise in mitigating such damage when incorporated into sunscreens. We evaluated RA’s possible interactions and potential to enhance the efficacy of three worldwide known UVB filters—ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (EHMC), octocrylene (OCT), and ethylhexyl salicylate (EHS). The performance of sunscreens with and without RA (0.1% w/w) was analyzed through in vitro and in vivo photoprotective assessments. The HPLC-TBARS-EVSC (high-performance liquid chromatography—thiobarbituric acid reactive substances—ex vivo stratum corneum) protocol, which quantified oxidative stress reduction in the human stratum corneum, was also used. The in vitro photoprotective assays showed that RA had distinct levels of interactions with the UVB filters. When associated with EHMC, RA exclusively acted in the UVB range (SPF-enhancing effect). Remarkably, for EHS, RA contributed to a higher efficacy profile in the total UV spectrum. OCT-RA was the sample that reached the highest critical wavelength value parallelly to OCT, boosting the in vivo SPF by more than 157% in comparison to OCT. However, its in vitro SPF performance was not affected by the RA addition, being comparable to OCT, EHS, and EHS-RA. Furthermore, the HPLC-TBARS-EVSC protocol highlighted RA’s ability to reduce lipid peroxidation, with OCT-RA exhibiting the most notable protective effect. These findings underscore RA’s potential as a multifunctional additive in sunscreen systems, enhancing both photoprotection and oxidative stress mitigation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 274 |
Journal | Antioxidants |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 by the authors.
Funding
This research was funded by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient\u00EDfico e Tecnol\u00F3gico, Brazil (CNPq, Process 303862/2022-0); Coordena\u00E7\u00E3o de Aperfei\u00E7oamento de Pessoal de N\u00EDvel Superior, Brazil (CAPES, Finance Code 001); the Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal (FCT), I.P. through national funds under DOI 10.54499/UIDP/04567/2020, DOI 10.54499/UIDB/04567/2020; and the Funda\u00E7\u00E3o de Amparo \u00E0 Pesquisa do Estado de S\u00E3o Paulo, Brazil (FAPESP, grant numbers 2021/13276-0, and 2024/01920-0). P.I.d.S.M. and C.F.H. are thankful to FAPESP and CNPq, respectively, for the scientific initiation scholarships. G.d.A.M. is thankful to CAPES for the master\u2019s scholarship. C.R. is thankful to FCT, Portugal. A.R.B. is thankful to CNPq-Brazil, for the research productivity scholarship, and to FAPESP, Brazil.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia | |
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior | |
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo | |
Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal | |
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico | 303862/2022-0 |
Keywords
- ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate
- ethylhexyl salicylate
- octocrylene
- sun protection factor
- tape stripping