Colaboración terapéutica: Estudio comparativo de dos casos contrastantes con terapia constructivista

Translated title of the contribution: Therapeutic collaboration: A comparative study of two contrasting cases of constructivist therapy

Eugénia Ribeiro, Joana Silveira, Ana Azevedo, Joana Senra, Ângela Ferreira, Dulce Pinto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This case study aimed to compare the therapeutic collaboration evolution in a good outcome and a poor outcome of constructivist therapy. 1973 therapeutic exchanges between the therapist and the clients were independently coded using the Therapeutic Collaboration Coding System throughout 21 sessions. The results show that non-collaborative exchanges were more frequent in the poor outcome case, and that the therapist used more challenging interventions as the therapy progressed. On the other hand, in the good outcome case, there was a higher prevalence of responses of novelty from the client, as well as a better balance between challenging and supporting interventions. Research and clinical implications will be discussed.

Translated title of the contributionTherapeutic collaboration: A comparative study of two contrasting cases of constructivist therapy
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)127-139
Number of pages13
JournalRevista Argentina de Clinica Psicologica
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Fundación AIGLé.

Keywords

  • Comparative case study
  • Constructivist therapy
  • Therapeutic collaboration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Therapeutic collaboration: A comparative study of two contrasting cases of constructivist therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this