TY - JOUR
T1 - Attachment styles, pain, and the consumption of analgesics during labor
T2 - A prospective observational study
AU - Costa-Martins, José Manuel
AU - Pereira, Marco
AU - Martins, Henriqueta
AU - Moura-Ramos, Mariana
AU - Coelho, Rui
AU - Tavares, Jorge
PY - 2014/3
Y1 - 2014/3
N2 - Individuals with less secure attachment styles have been shown to experience more pain than people with more secure attachment styles; however, attachment styles have not yet been examined in the context of labor pain and analgesic consumption. The purpose of this prospective observational study was to assess the influence of the mother's attachment style on the perception of labor pain, as assessed by a visual analog scale and analgesic consumption. Eighty-one pregnant women with a mean age of 32 years (standard deviation = 5.1) were assessed during the third trimester of pregnancy and during labor. The physical predictors of labor pain were recorded, and the adult attachment style was assessed with the Adult Attachment Scale-Revised. For labor analgesia, a low dose of patient-controlled epidural analgesia protocol (ropivacaine.6 mg/mL plus sufentanil.5 μg/mL) was used. Women with a secure attachment style reported significantly less labor pain (P <.001) and a significantly lower analgesic consumption during labor (P <.001) than insecurely attached women. These findings suggest that women's attachment style was associated with labor pain and analgesic consumption and support the relevance of the attachment theory as a promising conceptual framework for understanding labor pain. Perspective This study showed that women with an insecure attachment style were more likely to report higher pain before patient-controlled epidural analgesia and higher analgesic consumption and to request supplemental analgesia during labor. The assessment of adult attachment has the potential to identify women at high risk of poorly coping with pain during childbirth.
AB - Individuals with less secure attachment styles have been shown to experience more pain than people with more secure attachment styles; however, attachment styles have not yet been examined in the context of labor pain and analgesic consumption. The purpose of this prospective observational study was to assess the influence of the mother's attachment style on the perception of labor pain, as assessed by a visual analog scale and analgesic consumption. Eighty-one pregnant women with a mean age of 32 years (standard deviation = 5.1) were assessed during the third trimester of pregnancy and during labor. The physical predictors of labor pain were recorded, and the adult attachment style was assessed with the Adult Attachment Scale-Revised. For labor analgesia, a low dose of patient-controlled epidural analgesia protocol (ropivacaine.6 mg/mL plus sufentanil.5 μg/mL) was used. Women with a secure attachment style reported significantly less labor pain (P <.001) and a significantly lower analgesic consumption during labor (P <.001) than insecurely attached women. These findings suggest that women's attachment style was associated with labor pain and analgesic consumption and support the relevance of the attachment theory as a promising conceptual framework for understanding labor pain. Perspective This study showed that women with an insecure attachment style were more likely to report higher pain before patient-controlled epidural analgesia and higher analgesic consumption and to request supplemental analgesia during labor. The assessment of adult attachment has the potential to identify women at high risk of poorly coping with pain during childbirth.
KW - Attachment styles
KW - analgesic consumption
KW - labor pain
KW - patient-controlled epidural analgesia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896852151&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.12.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.12.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 24393700
AN - SCOPUS:84896852151
SN - 1526-5900
VL - 15
SP - 304
EP - 311
JO - Journal of Pain
JF - Journal of Pain
IS - 3
ER -